fbpx
Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
POULTRY PORK
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Poultry Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Sponsored By Zoetis

.
Featured Video Play Icon

Both organic, conventional processing reduce Campylobacter on carcasses

Both conventional and organic processing methods reduced Campylobacter on broiler carcasses in a recent study by Purdue University.

In addition, there was a drastic reduction in Campylobacter populations between the initial processing and post-chill steps, a finding that underscores the important role processing interventions play in producing a safer product, Matthew Bailey, a grad student at the university, said at the 2017 International Poultry Scientific Forum.1

Foodborne infection caused by Campylobacter is one of the top causes of foodborne illnesses, he said. In 2011 alone, there were 800,000 reported cases of Campylobacter among humans in the US, and most were associated with poultry. That fact, coupled with increased demand for organic poultry, initiated the study comparing the effects of conventional and organic methods of processing and their impact on presumptive Campylobacter populations in a commercial setting.

Sampling procedures

For the study, Bailey and colleagues collected samples eight times throughout the year from a commercial broiler facility during conventional processing and eight times from the same facility when it was processing organic birds. They spread out sampling days throughout a 1-year period.

On each visit, they took fecal grab samples from incoming birds as well as samples from carcass rinses, then determined the presumptive Campylobacter population by plate-count method using Campy-Cefex agar, a medium used specifically to isolate Campylobacter.

Carcasses from conventionally raised birds were treated with a cetylpyridinium chloride rinse, a standard industry practice, while the organically raised birds were washed in peracetic acid. Both the conventional and organic broilers went through water- and air-chilling steps, Bailey explained.

Incoming Campy-Cefex populations were higher (p < 0.05) on conventional processing days (3.7 log10CFU/mL) than on organic processing days (2.8 log10CFU/mL). Samples from conventionally processed birds also had higher Campylobacter counts in the feces, at post-feather-picking and post-evisceration compared to samples from organic birds. The reasons for these higher counts might be attributed to longer holding times of the birds before processing. In addition, cross contamination might have occurred during earlier stages of processing, he said.

There was no difference (p > 0.05) in Campylobacter populations between processing methods after chill, with both methods reducing populations dramatically — to less than 0.4 log10CFU/ mL, Bailey reported.

 

1 Bailey M. et al. Assessment of Campylobacter populations in broiler carcasses from a facility using organic and conventional processing methods. 2017 International Poultry Scientific Forum. Atlanta, Georgia.

 




Posted on May 3, 2017

tags: , , , ,
RELATED NEWS



You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.