fbpx
Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
POULTRY PORK
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Poultry Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Sponsored By Zoetis

.

S. enteritidis shedding more frequent among hens in conventional cages

Fecal shedding of Salmonella enteritidis was significantly more frequent among experimentally infected laying hens in conventional cages compared to hens housed in enriched colony cages, indicates a study from USDA and North Carolina State University researchers.1

Animal-welfare concerns have initiated the development of alternatives to traditional caged housing for hens. Unknown is whether different housing systems affect the introduction, transmission and persistence of Salmonella in poultry, which can be a source of illness in people, poultry research microbiologist richard gast, PhD, of USDA’s agricultural research Service, said at the 2015 Poultry Science association annual meeting.

Gast and colleagues monitored fecal shedding among laying hens in two trials. In each trial, they distributed 136 hens into conventional or enriched colony cages and then orally inoculated them with S. enteritidis. at weekly intervals, the researchers cultured samples of voided feces to test for the pathogen.

S. enteritidis fecal shedding after inoculation was detected for up to 8 weeks among hens in the enriched colony cages and for up to 10 weeks among hens housed in conventional cages, he said.

For both trials combined, the frequency of positive samples after inoculation in conventionally housed hens versus hens in enriched colony cages was 84.7% versus 71.5% 1 week later, 54.2% versus 31.3% 2 weeks later, 21.5% versus 7.6% 3 weeks later and 9.7% versus 2.8% 4 weeks later.  The difference between the two groups was significant (p < 0.05), Gast said.

“These results demonstrate that the susceptibility of hens to intestinal colonization by S. enteritidis can differ between conventional and enriched cage-based production systems, although this effect does not necessarily translate into a corresponding difference in the longer-term persistence of fecal shedding,” he said.

1Gast R, et al. Persistence of fecal shedding of Salmonella enteritidis by experimentally infected laying hens housed in conventional or enriched cages. 2015 Poultry Science Association annual meeting, Louisville, Ky.





tags: , , , ,
RELATED NEWS



You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.