fbpx
Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Sweepstakes Rules

We’re glad you’re enjoying Poultry Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X
REPORTSCollect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
POULTRY
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Sponsored by Zoetis

Sponsored By Zoetis

.
PHTweb FSIS FoodSafety 279799280

Reaction of poultry company customers to FSIS performance standards varied

Publication of USDA performance standards prompted some poultry company customers to refuse product from processing plants in Category 3, according to participants at a food safety roundtable.

When USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) results were initially published, there was a lot of misunderstanding about the categories, and it’s taken a lot of education to explain the FSIS process, said Juan Devillena, director of quality assurance and food safety, Wayne Farms.

There are still customers who do not want poultry from processing plants in Category 3 and will only take products from plants in Categories 1 or 2, he said.

PHT PGT20universal20article20icon 150 Tur

Categories 1 or 2 means the plant has met Salmonella performance standards, while Category 3 means the processing plant has exceeded the Salmonella standard.

“I believe the situation is stable now, but I also believe it’s still having a big impact,” DeVillena said at the roundtable “Coming Together for Food Safety.” “It’s definitely a burden, especially in the sales arena.”

Affects customer contracts

Douglas Fulnechek, DVM, senior public health veterinarian, Zoetis, and formerly a supervisory veterinary medical officer, FSIS, said some contracts poultry companies have with fast-food customers stipulate that the poultry supplied will come only from plants in Categories 1 and 2.

He said he has been asked on several occasions by poultry companies with plants in Category 3 to conduct an investigation and analysis similar to what FSIS would do; then he writes a report that the poultry companies can provide to fast-food customers to show their commitment to improvement.

On the West Coast, the situation has been a bit different, at least for some companies, said Robert O’Connor, DVM, senior vice president, technical services, Foster Farms.

Initially the company had requests from customers who asked about how the company’s processing plants were faring on FSIS categories.

“We got a form letter from one large box-store customer; we replied with a form letter and never heard from them again,” he said.

O’Connor believes the original intention of FSIS was to improve food safety by increasing customer pressure, but “I don’t really feel like the categories are having the impact on the industry that FSIS intended them to.”

Customers realize the sampling program and categorization of processing plant results are more complex and challenging than they originally appeared, he said.

 

Admin Ajax

Read the rest of this article and download our “Coming Together for Food Safety” special report.

 

 

 

Shareicon Pht 1
Share It
Publication of USDA performance standards prompted some poultry company customers to refuse product from processing plants in Category 3, according to participants at a food safety roundtable.

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.



Posted on August 26, 2021

tags:
RELATED NEWS



You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.