fbpx
Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
POULTRY PORK
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Poultry Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Sponsored By Zoetis

.
Featured Video Play Icon

Gizzard changes seen in NAE flocks but diagnosis is murky

Raising broilers without antibiotics appears to be affecting the gizzard in ways that aren’t yet fully appreciated, and it’s not clear if the changes observed are true gizzard erosions, Jessica Hockaday, DVM, told Poultry Health Today.

During her residency at Mississippi State University, Hockaday conducted a field study for a poultry company that thought it had a problem with gizzard erosion in its “no antibiotics ever” (NAE) flocks. The company also raised conventional flocks, so Hockaday evaluated a total of 80 gizzards obtained from both flocks.

Compared to gizzards from conventional flocks, gizzards from NAE flocks had more surface bacteria, she reported.

The tough layer made of the carbohydrate-protein complex koilin, which protects the muscles in the gizzard, was thicker and showed sloughing (shedding of dead skin) and edema (excess watery fluid).

Unexpected finding

In addition, gizzards from NAE flocks showed more hemorrhaging without inflammation in the koilin layer — an unexpected finding discovered during microscopic examination — that wasn’t apparent upon gross examination, said Hockaday, now a veterinarian at Aviagen.

Gizzards from conventional flocks had thicker glandular layers and more inflammation compared to the gizzards from NAE flocks, she added.

Were the changes seen in the gizzards of NAE flocks necessarily gizzard erosions? True gizzard erosion has been linked to many possible causes, Hockaday said, including viruses contracted from parent flocks, mycotoxins, nutritional issues and even chemicals such as formaldehyde, used as a disinfectant in the hatchery.

No ulceration

She noted that what she observed in her study doesn’t match textbook descriptions of gizzard erosions. “…they looked grossly like they were gizzard erosions,” but the ulcerations usually seen with erosions were not present.

This raises the question of whether the changes she has observed were, in fact, gizzard erosions or something else altogether, Hockaday said. Management changes, such as transitioning to NAE production or raising broilers in a pasture, might be leading to gizzard issues that aren’t yet obvious, she said.

Perhaps the greatest need is for everyone to “be on the same page” regarding the definition of gizzard erosion and consideration needs to be given to other types of gizzard changes that might result from shifts in production practices, Hockaday said.

 




Posted on March 21, 2019

tags: , , ,
RELATED NEWS



You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.