Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Sweepstakes Rules

We’re glad you’re enjoying Poultry Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app
REPORTSCollect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Poultry Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Sponsored By Zoetis


Editorial: Never say never

Timothy Cummings, DVM, PhD
Senior Technical Services Veterinarian, Zoetis Inc.

As a veterinarian, I’ve been following the antibiotic-free trend in the US poultry industry for many years. Not that long ago, the thought of raising broilers on a large scale without ionophores or other intestinal health antibiotics would have seemed foolhardy. But that has changed in recent years, as we’ve learned how best to grow and manage antibiotic-free (ABF) flocks. This has come at a cost of lost efficiency for most operations, but these practices have allowed poultry companies to reduce or eliminate antibiotic use in a portion or all of their production with varying degrees of success.

The integrators who implemented ABF production chose to enter this market — and there are valuable lessons we can learn from them. But as the industry expands ABF production — a trend born mostly out of consumer perceptions, not documented public-health threats — we need to make sure we understand the consequences of this paradigm shift:

“No” and “never” are strong words to use when talking about antibiotics in food-animal production. If you don’t want to use them, fine. But we, as an industry, should not allow using FDA-approved feed additive medications to somehow be perceived as producing a product that is less wholesome. That, in essence, is what happens when ABF is used as a marketing tool.

All veterinarians take an oath to use their “scientific knowledge and skills…for the protection of animal health and welfare…” I know most veterinarians involved with ABF programs in the US; they are all highly skilled and deeply committed to the health and welfare of the birds under their care. On the other hand, we know ABF production often increases disease pressure and mortality, which puts our science-driven profession at an ethical crossroads.

The new FDA antimicrobial guidelines are here— and we all need to fully understand them. Most of the industry understands that we can still use feed antibiotics for treating, controlling and preventing disease. However, some may not appreciate that there are still non-medically important antibiotics that have retained their performance claims. FDA has deemed these products safe and effective. In my opinion, we’d do well to make judicious use of all of the valuable, time-tested tools available to us.

I don’t have all the answers, but this much I know: There are more conversations the poultry industry needs to have with our consumers.


Timothy Cummings, DVM, PhD Senior Technical Services Veterinarian, Zoetis, Inc.

Timothy Cummings, DVM, PhD
Senior Technical Services Veterinarian


Editor’s note: For more insights, see the results of Dr. Cummings’ ABF survey in the June 2014 edition of PoultryUSA or at wattagnet.com.


Posted on July 19, 2014

  • Free booklet offers insights for addressing IBH in broilers

    Poultry veterinarians throughout the US broiler industry are reporting a re-emergence of inclusion body hepatitis (IBH). The disease, caused by fowl adenovirus (FAdV), often strikes with little warning and can result in high mortality and significant economic losses...

  • Use ‘tools of discovery’ and all your senses to identify emerging poultry diseases

    Emerging and re-emerging diseases can cause sudden, potentially catastrophic illness and death in commercial poultry flocks, said R.M. “Mick” Fulton, DVM, PhD, Michigan State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory.

  • Salmonella serotypes are changing — monitor which ones are in your flock

    It’s imperative for poultry producers and companies to know what strains of Salmonella may be circulating in their flocks, said Chuck Hofacre, president of the Southern Poultry Research Group in Georgia.

  • Changes ahead for 2023 AAAP annual meeting

    Next year marks a big change for the AAAP. It will hold its first independent meeting, according to current president Louise Dufour-Zavala, DVM, executive director of the Georgia Poultry Laboratory Network.

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.