Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Poultry Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app


Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Poultry Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Sponsored By Zoetis


Antibiotic-resistant genes found in environment but not in food

Environmental pathways might pose a greater risk than the food supply for the transfer of antibiotic-resistant infections to humans, suggests a recent study by US and Canadian researchers.

The study was conducted with cattle, but its findings are still relevant to the poultry industry.

The investigators pooled samples from over 1,700 cattle in eight different pens in four different feedlots in two different states. They collected soil, water and manure samples in multiple stages, from incoming feeder cattle through post-slaughter, and using the latest DNA sequencing technology, identified over 300 unique antimicrobial resistance genes, reports meatpoultry.com

During the feeding period, however, the array of antimicrobial resistance genes narrowed, indicating selective pressures. All cattle had received macrolides (tylosin) in the feed, but administration of antimicrobial drugs to individual animals was infrequent; at least one animal within each group received doses of tetracyclines.

When the researchers tested beef trimmings during processing — perhaps the most likely place for contamination to occur — the researchers found no antimicrobial resistance genes

This suggests the interventions packers use today for pathogens appear to remove the antimicrobial resistance genes that could be transmitted to humans and suggests that beef products are not a likely source of antimicrobial resistance.

Notable discovery

Upon environmental testing, the researchers made a notable discovery. A very small number of soil and water samples from a feedyard pen, a plant holding pen and trucks showed the presence of resistance genes to antibiotics not used in cattle. It is unclear whether these antimicrobial resistance genes were triggered by the use of other drugs or migrated there via feedlot workers, working dogs or horses, or through air or water.

The results suggest that slaughter-based intervention systems minimize the likelihood of antimicrobial resistance genes being passed through the food chain and highlight the potential risk posed by indirect environmental exposures, conclude the researchers, from Colorado State University, the University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine and the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Center.

“While our results are more directly relevant to large North American feedlot operations, the general approach can easily be extended to other sectors of beef production, other countries and other livestock production systems,” they say in their published report on elifesciences.org.


Article on meatpoultry.com

Full article on elifesciences.org



Posted on April 26, 2016

tags: ,

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Share It
Shifting downtime to 2 weeks can significantly reduce S. Heidelberg loads in poultry litter, according to a research microbiologist with the USDA. Adapting litter management could also limit the presence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella in the barn.

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.
Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.