Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Sweepstakes Rules

We’re glad you’re enjoying Poultry Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app
REPORTSCollect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Sponsored by Zoetis

Sponsored By Zoetis

PHTweb Keck 2100 Sr Cr

Q&A: What’s behind FDA’s updated veterinary feed directive?

An interview with LLOYD KECK, DVM, senior technical services veterinarian, Zoetis

Q: What’s the reasoning behind the updated veterinary feed directive (VFD) rule that takes effect January 1, 2017?

LK: FDA recognizes the important role antimicrobials play in maintaining the health, performance and welfare of poultry and livestock. At the same time, it wants them used in ways that address public health concerns, specifically antimicrobial-resistant infections in people. FDA is, therefore, encouraging more “judicious” use of antimicrobials in food animals if the medications are considered medically important to human medicine.

Q: What does this mean in practical terms for poultry producers?

LK: It means FDA is requiring increased veterinary oversight when medically important antimicrobials are used in food animals. Before feeding a medically important antimicrobial to poultry flocks — chlortetracycline, tylosin or virginiamycin, for example — producers and their feed mill will need to obtain a VFD from a licensed veterinarian. If a medically important antimicrobial is to be administered in water, a traditional prescription from a licensed veterinarian —an Rx—is required as of January 2017. Fortunately, this new process should prove to be relatively seamless for integrated poultry companies that have full control over production, feed and veterinary care.

Q: Why has FDA focused on oral medications?

LK: Because they are well suited to mass administration — and therefore of greater concern than, say, injectable medications, which have to be given to one animal at a time and typically only for therapeutic purposes.

Q: What does FDA mean exactly by “judicious” and “non-judicious” use of an antimicrobial?

LK: Judicious use means administering an antimicrobial medication appropriately and only when really necessary. An example would be using an antimicrobial for treating clinically sick birds, to control a spreading disease or to prevent a prevalent disease like necrotic enteritis in flocks at risk, according to FDA.

Non-judicious use would be using a medically important antimicrobial without veterinary consultation or a VFD or using any antimicrobial — medically important or not — for a purpose not on the label.

Q: How does FDA determine which antimicrobials are medically important to humans?

LK: Medically important antimicrobials fall into three different categories: important, highly important and critically important.

An antimicrobial is important if there is cross-resistance within its drug class or linked resistance with other drug classes. These types of resistance occur when disease-causing bacteria become tolerant to one drug through exposure to another similar drug.

An antimicrobial is highly important if it’s used to treat enteric pathogens that cause food-borne illness, or if there are no or few other alternatives for treatment of human disease.

Finally, if it satisfies both of these criteria, FDA considers it critically important.

Q: Under the updated rule, can any in-feed antimicrobials be used to enhance the performance of poultry flocks?

LK: Not if they are deemed medically important by FDA. However, indications such as “increased rate of weight gain” and “improved feed efficiency” will still be approved for poultry antimicrobials that aren’t considered to be medically important. Examples are BMD (bacitracin methylene disalicylate) and Flavomycin 4 (bambermycins).

Q: As a poultry veterinarian, what are your thoughts on FDA’s updated VFD rule?

LK: I fully support government initiatives to promote more judicious use of medically important antimicrobials. Sure, it will mean a little more paperwork and recordkeeping for veterinarians, feed mills and producers, but it’s a minor inconvenience if it helps ensure long-term antibiotic efficacy for both humans and animals.

Furthermore, the new rule applies to less than 15% of the feed medications used in US poultry. The rest — ionophores, synthetic anticoccidials, bacitracin and bambermycins — are not deemed medically important by FDA and therefore won’t require a VFD.

Q: How will the industry know if the updated VFD rules have been a success?

LK: That remains to be seen. We know FDA and USDA are collaborating with other scientists to develop a new mathematical model that’ll provide a more complete picture of the relationship between antimicrobial use in food-producing animals and resistance. It will be important for all industry stakeholders — veterinarians, producers and feed-mill managers — to pay close attention to this evaluation process and make their voices heard.



Download Button   Download Q&A: What’s behind FDA’s updated veterinary feed directive? (pdf, 93 KB)





Posted on October 11, 2016

tags: ,
  • UK makes significant cuts in poultry antibiotic use

    The UK poultry sector has reduced its antibiotic use by more than 70% over four years, according to latest industry figures.

  • FDA lists two principles for “judicious” antimicrobial use

    FDA strongly acknowledges that effective antimicrobials are critically important for combating infectious disease in both humans and animals.

  • How FDA will measure success of new VFD rule

    FDA has target dates in place for finalizing its data-collection plan and for determining whether efforts to promote the “judicious use” of antibiotics in food animals is having an impact on antibiotic resistance.

  • Judicious antibiotic use: What does it mean in poultry?

    By Dennis P. Wages, DVM, Dipl. ACPV Professor, Poultry Health Management Department of Population Health and Pathobiology College of Veterinary Medicine — North Carolina State University

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.