Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Poultry Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app


Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Poultry Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Sponsored By Zoetis


Judicious antibiotic use key to animal and food health

Encouraging responsible of antibiotics rather than banning them entirely is vital to maintaining animal health and producing healthy food supplies, say agricultural and veterinary leaders.

Speaking on a panel at the Public Meeting of the Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in Washington, experts from a range of disciplines said being able to use antimicrobials to treat, manage and limit illness was important to farmers.

Without them, animal health and welfare would be compromised, while the industry’s ability to produce safe supplies of food could be at risk, reports WATTAgNet.

In a discussion on antimicrobial resistance in animal production, experts including Thomas Meyer of the American Veterinary Medical Association and Richard Carnevale of the Animal Health Institute said responsible use of antibiotics did not mean eliminating their use.

“Antimicrobials are an important part of a veterinarian’s tool kit,” Meyer said. “Antibiotics, when used properly, can save lives.”

Carnevale said that the veterinary community tries its best to prevent disease with vaccines, but antibiotics are still needed when disease prevention isn’t enough.

The animal health community still needs to develop new, novel vaccines, antimicrobials and alternatives to keep America’s production animals healthy, he added.

Carnevale said he was also concerned by the trend towards promoting antibiotic-free labeling on food as there was no evidence that it was safer than food produced from conventionally-reared animals.

“One of my concerns about labelling and marketing is getting ahead of the science. We can’t get ahead of the science,” he said.

Full article

Posted on June 27, 2017

tags: ,

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Share It
Shifting downtime to 2 weeks can significantly reduce S. Heidelberg loads in poultry litter, according to a research microbiologist with the USDA. Adapting litter management could also limit the presence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella in the barn.

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.
Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.