fbpx
Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)

We’re glad you’re enjoying Poultry Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
POULTRY PORK
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Poultry Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Sponsored By Zoetis

.
Videos or photos cannot be used to document VCPR, VFD forms

EU could face further restrictions on antibiotic use in farm animals

Further restrictions on the use of antibiotics in farm animals may be underway for the EU, a development that could be especially problematic for poultry producers.

In a draft legislation that would update an EU law on veterinary medicine, the European Parliament called for a ban on the preventive treatment of animals, which they believe will counter antibiotic resistance, according to a report on worldpoultry.net.

“We wish to prohibit the purely preventive use of antibiotics, restrict collective treatment to very specific cases, prohibit the veterinary use of antibiotics that are critically important for human medicine and put an end to online sales,” said French Member of Parliament (MEP) Françoise Grossetête.

The MEPs insisted that veterinary medicines must not be used to improve livestock performance or compensate for poor animal husbandry. Any prophylactic use of antimicrobials — where they are used as a preventive measure in the absence of clinical signs of infection — should be limited to single animals and must be fully justified by a veterinarian.

Effect on poultry industry

This is likely to be especially problematic for the poultry sector, where whole flocks are often treated as a strategic measure to avoid having to use stronger medication later on.

Pekka Pesonen, of Copa-Cogeca, a European farming and agriculture cooperative, said, “Banning the use of certain antibiotics could lead to animal-welfare problems, as in some places or for some species these are the only authorized antibiotics.”

He also believes banning the prophylactic use of antibiotics was not justified.

“We realize that there needs to be specific requirements for food-producing animals compared to pets, but the correct use of prophylaxis is a good veterinary practice,” Pesonen said.

“We also have concerns about the online ban on antibiotics and prescription-only veterinary medicines. Online sales offer some advantages in terms of availability and the cost of medicines.”

 

Full article




Posted on April 28, 2016

tags: , , ,
RELATED NEWS



You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Share It
Shifting downtime to 2 weeks can significantly reduce S. Heidelberg loads in poultry litter, according to a research microbiologist with the USDA. Adapting litter management could also limit the presence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella in the barn.

Click an icon to share this information with your industry contacts.
Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.