Sign up now!
Don't show this again
Sweepstakes Rules

We’re glad you’re enjoying Poultry Health Today.
Access is free but you’ll need to register to view more content.
Already registered? Sign In
Tap to download the app
REPORTSCollect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report


Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
follow us

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Sponsored by Zoetis

Sponsored By Zoetis


E. coli vaccination helps contain losses in broilers with IB infection

Field experience with infectious bronchitis (IB) in broilers during a harsh winter demonstrated that vaccination for secondary Escherichia coli infection helped stem losses, according to Kalen Cookson, DVM, MAM.

Broiler flocks in the poultry-dense Delmarva region of the US had been affected by the DMV-1639 IB strain.

At the time, no vaccines were available to protect against the emerging pathogen, which gained momentum throughout the winter, Cookson, director of clinical research, Zoetis, told Poultry Health Today at the 2018 International Avian Respiratory Disease Conference.

The producer opted to implement a controlled field trial and vaccinated against E. coli to minimize losses from this secondary infection, common in broilers with IB.

“If you look real closely, you can see that at first you have head snicking, conjunctivitis [in the flock]. You can have shaking heads and coughing — all the classic symptoms of a bronchitis outbreak…But that’s not usually what the birds succumb to. It’s usually the E. coli infection that comes in behind all of that damage…,” Cookson said.

Classic E. coli signs

The first sign of a secondary E. coli infection is usually increased mortality. In post-mortem examinations, Cookson said, there’s often “cheesy” material in the air sacs, as well as other findings such as pericarditis and perihepatitis — classic signs of E. coli infection, he said.

In his presentation at the conference, Cookson reported that livability for the Delmarva producer increased in birds of all sizes vaccinated for E. coli. For comparison, some in each weight group received one and some two doses of the vaccine. Overall, they were four times less likely to have excessive grower mortality compared to controls.

In most situations, one-time administration of the E. coli vaccine for broilers is probably sufficient, but in flocks with significant mortality — which occurred among large birds in the Delmarva flocks — day-of-age vaccination followed by a booster at 16 days of age “really cut down on…what some people might call ‘train-wreck flocks,’” he said.

Pen studies in broilers have also been conducted to compare E. colic vaccination protocols. Administration only at day-of-age, only at 18 days of age or when the vaccine is administered at both ages will all reduce E. coli lesions, but the two-dose protocol provided almost entire protection, Cookson said.

Asked about the impact of the trend toward elimination of antibiotics from the hatchery, he said it has “absolutely” opened the door for more problems with bacteria.

“When we don’t have those tools to diminish the loads of bacteria starting from the hatchery all the way through production, then naturally the level of exposure is going to be higher in our systems and on our birds. If there’s any level of immune suppression, that’s going to compound things and create more opportunities for E. coli…and other bacterial infections.”

Editor’s note: This video interview, podcast and news article were developed independently by the editors of Poultry Health Today. They are presented here solely for their news value. The opinions and recommendations presented are not necessarily shared by the editors of Poultry Health Today or the interviewee’s employer. 

Posted on January 16, 2019

tags: , , ,

You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.