fbpx
Sign up now!
Don't show this again

Thank you for confirming your subscription!

(And remember, if ever you want to change your email preferences or unsubscribe, just click on the links at the bottom of any email.)
Tap to download the app
X
Share
X

REPORTS

Collect articles and features into your own report to read later, print or share with others

Create a New Report

Favorites

Read Later

Create a new report

Report title (required) Brief description (optional)
CREATE
X
NEXT
POULTRY PORK
follow us


You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Favorites Read Later My Reports PHT Special Reports
Poultry Health Today is equipped with some amazing (and free) tools for organizing and sharing content, as well as creating your own magazines and special reports. To access them, please register today.
Sponsored by Zoetis

Sponsored By Zoetis

.

Activist groups defeated in attempts to curb antibiotic use

Two activist efforts recently suffered defeats in attempts to curb antibiotic use in US animal agriculture, according to a report in Influence Feed.

The Second Circuit of the US Court of Appeals denied a petition by the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), ruling the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not have to curtail use of the antibiotics in animals.

In response, food writer Ruth Reichl penned a stern July 30 op-ed in The New York Times, “The FDA’s Blatant Failure on Food,” in which she called Guidance 213 “toothless” and the federal appeals court ruling “appalling.”

According to Influence Feed, the vast majority of influencer shares were supportive of her position, including sustainability speaker Marc Gunther, Superbug author Maryn McKenna, Civil Eats‘ Naomi Starkman, Food Babe Vani Hari and food writer Jane Black.

However, food writer James McWilliams found fault with Reichl’s broad call to action, questioning the weight of the op-ed: “All the bigwig food guys in the Twittersphere are acting as if the wheel has been reinvented by the article.”

Additionally, on July 31, the USDA Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) rejected a petition in which the CSPI had requested that antibiotic-resistant Salmonella be declared an adulterant.

The move caused food safety attorney Bill Marler to declare, “It’s a good day to be Salmonella” and CSPI food safety director Caroline Smith DeWaal to state, “USDA’s failure to act on antibiotic-resistant strains of Salmonella in the meat supply ignores vital information about the public health risk posed by these pathogens.”

In its response, the FSIS explained, “In the absence of a clear association with human illness, FSIS does not consider raw meat and poultry products … to be adulterated when they include Salmonella because ordinary methods of cooking and preparing food kill Salmonella.”

Visit Influence Feed for more industry trends and insights from key opinion leaders.




Posted on August 13, 2014

tags:
RELATED NEWS



You must be logged in to edit your profile.

Google Translate is provided on this website as a reference tool. However, Poultry Health Today and its sponsor and affiliates do not guarantee in any way the accuracy of the translated content and are not responsible for any event resulting from the use of the translation provided by Google. By choosing a language other than English from the Google Translate menu, the user agrees to withhold all liability and/or damage that may occur to the user by depending on or using the translation by Google.